Multithreaded Programming Guide
  Rechercher uniquement dans ce livre
Télécharger cet ouvrage au format PDF

Safe and Unsafe Interfaces

6

This chapter defines MT-safety levels for functions and libraries.
Thread Safetypage 149
MT Interface Safety Levelspage 151
Async-Signal-Safe Functionspage 153
MT Safety Levels for Librariespage 153

Thread Safety

Thread safety is the avoidance of data races--situations in which data are set to either correct or incorrect values depending upon the order in which multiple threads access and modify the data.
When no sharing is intended, give each thread a private copy of the data. When sharing is important, provide explicit synchronization to make certain that the program behaves deterministically.
A procedure is thread safe when it is logically correct when executed simultaneously by several threads. At a practical level, it is convenient to recognize three levels of safety.
  • Unsafe
  • Thread safe--Serializable
  • Thread safe--MT-safe
An unsafe procedure can be made thread safe and serializable by surrounding it with statements to lock and unlock a mutex. Code Example 6-1 shows a simplified implementation of fputs(), initially thread unsafe.
Next is a serializable version of this routine with a single mutex protecting the procedure from concurrent execution problems. Actually, this is stronger synchronization than is usually necessary. When two threads are sending output to different files using fputs(), one need not wait for the other--the threads need synchronization only when they are sharing an output file.
The last version is MT-safe. It uses one lock for each file, allowing two threads to print to different files at the same time. So, a routine is MT-safe when it is thread safe and its execution does not negatively affect performance.
Code Example 6-1 Degrees of Thread Safety

  /* not thread-safe */  
  fputs(const char *s, FILE *stream) {  
      char *p;  
      for (p=s; *p; p++)  
          putc((int)*p, stream);  
  }  
  
  /* serializable */  
  fputs(const char *s, FILE *stream) {  
      static mutex_t mut;  
      char *p;  
      mutex_lock(&m);  
      for (p=s; *p; p++)  
          putc((int)*p, stream);  
  
      mutex_unlock(&m);  
  }  
  
  /* MT-Safe */  
  mutex_t m[NFILE];  
  fputs(const char *s, FILE *stream) {  
      static mutex_t mut;  
      char *p;  
      mutex_lock(&m[fileno(stream)]);  
      for (p=s; *p; p++)  
          putc((int)*p, stream);  
      mutex_unlock(&m[fileno(stream)]0;  
  }  

MT Interface Safety Levels

The man Pages(3): Library Routines use the following categories to describe how well an interface supports threads (these categories are explained more fully in the Intro(3)man page).
SafeThis code can be called from a multithreaded application.
Safe with exceptionsSee the NOTES sections of these pages for a description of the exceptions.
UnsafeThis interface is not safe to use with multithreaded applications unless the application arranges for only one thread at a time to execute within the library.
MT-SafeThis interface is fully prepared for multithreaded access in that it is both safe and it supports some concurrency.
MT-Safe with exceptions See the NOTES sections of these pages in the man Pages(3): Library Routines for a list of the exceptions.
Async-Signal-SafeThis routine can safely be called from a signal handler. A thread that is executing an Async-Signal-Safe routine does not deadlock with itself when it is interrupted by a signal.
Fork1-SafeThis interface releases locks it has held whenever the Solaris fork1(2) or the POSIX fork(2) is called.
See the table in Appendix B, "MT Safety Levels: Library Interfaces," for the safety levels of interfaces from the man Pages(3): Library Routines. Check the man page to be sure of the level.
Some functions have purposely not been made safe for the following reasons.
  • Making the interface MT-Safe would have negatively affected the performance of single-threaded applications.
  • The interface has an Unsafe interface. For example, a function might return a pointer to a buffer in the stack. You can use reentrant counterparts for some of these functions. The reentrant function name is the original function name with "_r" appended.

Caution - There is no way to be certain that a function whose name does not end in "_r" is MT-Safe other than by checking its reference manual page. Use of a function identified as not MT-Safe must be protected by a synchronizing device or by restriction to the initial thread.

Reentrant Functions for Unsafe Interfaces

For most functions with Unsafe interfaces, an MT-Safe version of the routine exists. The name of the new MT-Safe routine is always the name of the old Unsafe routine with "_r" appended. The following "_r" routines are supplied in the Solaris system:
Table 6-1
in alphabetical ordergethostbyaddr_r(3n)getrpcent_r(3n)
asctime_r(3c)gethostbyname_r(3n)getservbyname_r(3n)
ctermid_r(3s)gethostent_r(3n)getservbyport_r(3n)
ctime_r(3c)getlogin_r(3c)getservent_r(3n)
fgetgrent_r(3c)getnetbyaddr_r(3n)getspent_r(3c)
fgetpwent_r(3c)getnetbyname_r(3n)getspnam_r(3c)
fgetspent_r(3c)getnetent_r(3n)gmtime_r(3c)
gamma_r(3m)getnetgrent_r(3n)lgamma_r(3m)
getauclassent_r(3)getprotobyname_r(3n)localtime_r(3c)
getauclassnam_r(3)getprotobynumber_r(3n)nis_sperror_r(3n)
getauevent_r(3)getprotoent_r(3n)rand_r(3c)
getauevnam_r(3)getpwent_r(3c)readdir_r(3c)
getauevnum_r(3)getpwnam_r(3c)strtok_r(3c)
getgrent_r(3c)getpwuid_r(3c)tmpnam_r(3s)
getgrgid_r(3c)getrpcbyname_r(3n)ttyname_r(3c)
getgrnam_r(3c)getrpcbynumber_r(3n)

Async-Signal-Safe Functions

Functions that can safely be called from signal handlers are Async-Signal-Safe. The POSIX standard defines and lists Async-Signal-Safe functions (IEEE Std 1003.1-1990, 3.3.1.3 (3)(f), page 55). In addition to the POSIX Async-Signal-Safe functions, these three functions from the Solaris threads library are also Async-Signal-Safe.
  • sema_post(3T)
  • thr_sigsetmask(3T), similar to pthread_sigmask(3T)
  • thr_kill(3T), similar to pthread_kill(3T)

MT Safety Levels for Libraries

All routines that can potentially be called by a thread from a multithreaded program should be MT-Safe.
This means that two or more activations of a routine must be able to correctly execute concurrently. So, every library interface that a multithreaded program uses must be MT-Safe.
Not all libraries are now MT-Safe. The commonly used libraries that are MT-Safe are listed in Table 6-2. Additional libraries will eventually be modified to be MT-Safe.
Table 6-2
LibraryComments
lib/libcInterfaces that are not safe have thread-safe interfaces of the form *_r (often with different semantics)
lib/libdl_stubsTo support static switch compiling
lib/libintlInternationalization library
lib/libmMT-Safe only when compiled for the shared library, but
not MT-Safe when linked with the archived library
lib/libmallocSpace-efficient memory allocation library; see malloc(3X)
lib/libmapmallocAlternative mmap(2)-based memory allocation library; see mapmalloc(3X)
Table 6-2
LibraryComments
lib/libnslThe TLI interface, XDR, RPC clients and servers, netdir, netselect and getXXbyYY interfaces are not safe, but have thread-safe interfaces of the form getXXbyYY_r
lib/libresolvThread-specific errno support
lib/libsocketSocket library for making network connections
lib/libwWide character and wide string functions for supporting multibyte locales
lib/straddrNetwork name-to-address translation library
lib/libX11X11 Windows library routines
lib/libCC++ runtime shared objects

Unsafe Libraries

Routines in libraries that are not guaranteed to be MT-Safe can safely be called by multithreaded programs only when such calls are single-threaded.